In just three hours, Japanese colonial authorities rounded up 466 Seoul residents for black-market trading, sentenced them on the spot, and sent them by streetcar to Seodaemun Prison (July 1945)

This article illustrates an example of the brutal “summary trials” carried out in connection with mass police sweeps against black-market sellers, just one of the ways the authorities in colonial Seoul appear to have been resorting to extraordinarily harsh measures in the streets of Seoul in July 1945 during the last weeks before Imperial Japan's surrender.

Judges and prosecutors left the courthouse and went directly to the sites of the crackdown, backed by plainclothes police. Police rounded up suspected black-market sellers, questioned them at the local police stations, and prosecutors immediately brought charges. Judges then conducted further questioning and handed down sentences on the spot. There was apparently no mercy. According to the article, not a single person was let off with a warning: everyone processed at Dongdaemun Police Station received between six months and one year of imprisonment.

The speed is staggering. The operation began at about 1 p.m. By 4 p.m., 466 people arrested across Seoul had already been sentenced and were being transported by streetcar to the notorious Seodaemun Prison. The entire process (from arrest, to questioning, prosecution, conviction, sentencing, and being sent to prison) took only around 3 hours. It is difficult to imagine how anything resembling a meaningful defense or fair trial could have taken place under such conditions.

The article itself proudly presented this as the first use of this wartime summary-trial procedure anywhere in Korea, made possible by the Wartime Special Criminal Law. About 90 percent of those arrested were women and girls, and the most common goods involved were vegetables.

Unfortunately, substantial portions of the original article have been lost. The newspaper page scanned by the National Library of Korea is extremely badly damaged, with pieces missing from several parts of the page. I previously asked ChatGPT to examine the damage pattern, and its assessment was that rodent gnawing was the most likely cause, based particularly on the curved, scalloped “bite” contours and the way the damage appears to progress inward from several exposed edges of the sheet.

Rodent-gnawed newspaper page from July 3, 1945

What survives, however, gives a remarkable glimpse of just how extreme wartime policing had become in Seoul in the final weeks of Japanese colonial rule.

Japanese colonial propaganda tended to portray black marketeers as greedy profiteers getting rich at the public’s expense. But when you look at the actual cases behind the rhetoric, many seem much more mundane: ordinary people running businesses and trying to buy and sell scarce goods in an economy increasingly strangled by wartime price controls and shortages.

I'm sharing a 1942 article below as one example. Mr. Kunimoto, who ran a restaurant in Yeongdeungpo, bought a bull from a Mr. Jeong for 650 yen and later sold it to a Mr. Yi for 680 yen. In ordinary terms, he made only 30 yen on the transaction. But because the government-fixed maximum price for the animal was 360 yen, the newspaper declares that he had made an “illicit profit” of 320 yen—the difference between the legal ceiling and the price at which he sold it.

Then the story takes a much darker turn. While her husband was being subjected to a “rigorous investigation” by the police, his wife, Gye-jeong, secretly went to the investigating officer’s home. Crying, she begged him to treat her husband leniently. After she left, the officer discovered that she had left behind an envelope containing the enormous sum of 1,000 yen. He reported her, and she was immediately arrested for bribery and detained as well.

Why risk such a desperate measure? As we saw in the July 1945 article, people arrested for black-market offenses could be subjected to extraordinarily rapid prosecution and sent directly to Seodaemun Prison, an institution notorious for the brutal treatment of prisoners. A 1,000-yen bribe was not the action of someone treating the matter as a minor regulatory fine; she apparently believed that something very serious could happen to her husband.

And yet the newspaper has remarkably little sympathy for her. The headline mocks the episode as “A Woman’s Foolish Scheme Fails to Land Her Catch,” while the opening sentence calls her a foolish woman who unsuccessfully tried to “hook” a policeman with money. Her fear and tears become material for ridicule.

That misogynistic tone is something I have started to notice repeatedly in these newspapers. Women—particularly Korean women—are often presented not simply as people behaving badly, but as objects of mockery, scolding, or moral instruction. Other articles attack women for continuing to wear chima or other improper clothing, or chastise women who fail to volunteer for wartime labor as evidence of backwardness or selfishness. 

I'm also sharing a 1941 article below as another example. In this case, the business involved dog pelts. Employees connected with a dog-leather factory bought and sold pelts on the black market rather than supplying them through the channels designated for military use, and the police arrested those involved.

What is particularly striking is how closely part of this story resembles the 1942 case above. Once again, the wife of an arrested man apparently became desperate enough to try bribing the authorities to secure her husband’s release. According to the article, two police officers were each offered 1,000 yen, the same amount that was quoted in the 1942 case.

And again, punishment through humiliation seems to be part of the storytelling. On top of naming and shaming the buyers and sellers, the article ridicules one of the arrested men by quoting him worrying tearfully about his future: with an arrest record like this, how was he ever going to get married?

That detail has little relevance to whether he violated the price-control laws. Its purpose seems to be to make the defendant look pathetic and foolish for the entertainment and moral instruction of the reader. The police investigation becomes almost a cautionary tale: break the economic regulations, and not only will you be arrested, but your name, your family, your embarrassment, and even your fears about your marriage prospects may be printed in the newspaper for everyone to see.

Taken together with the 1942 article, there seems to be a recurring formula here. Wartime economic offenders are labeled as profiteers, their names are publicly exposed, their family members’ desperate attempts to help them are turned into sensational stories, and the defendants themselves are portrayed as ridiculous figures deserving humiliation rather than as ordinary people navigating an increasingly coercive and scarcity-ridden wartime economy.

[Translation]

Gyeongseong Ilbo (Keijo Nippo) July 3, 1945

The Authorities Unleash Their Long-Reserved Powers Against the “Black Market”
Severe Measures: Prison Terms Imposed in Street-Side Summary Trials

Unable to stand by while markets of black-market peddlers disrupting wartime life operated openly in broad daylight, with goods changing hands at prices dozens of times the official rates, the Seoul District Court Prosecutors’ Office has now stepped up enforcement beyond fines and admonitions. For the first time, it invoked the Wartime Special Criminal Law on the spot. On July 2nd, judges and prosecutors took to the streets, conducted a severe mass roundup, and through summary proceedings sent the offenders directly to prison from the scene. Similar mass roundups will continue in waves, with the aim of wiping out the black market and securing a sound food supply for the people.

At 1 p.m. that day, judges and prosecutors deployed to several black markets within Seoul, and with the assistance of plainclothes police officers swept up the offenders en masse. After questioning at the respective police stations, sentences were pronounced on the spot. By 4 p.m., 127 persons from the Dongdaemun Police Station district, 65 persons from Seodaemun, 45 persons from Seongdong, 76 persons from Honmachi, 80 persons from Mapo, and 73 persons from Seongbuk had been taken by streetcar to Seodaemun Prison.

As many as ninety percent of the offenders were women and girls, and vegetables made up the largest share of the goods involved. At Dongdaemun Police Station, where the disposition of the offenders could be observed, police officers first conducted questioning. The visiting prosecutors Yamaguchi and Terazawa then reinvestigated the cases together with other officials and immediately filed charges. Judges Aihara and Iijima conducted still more rigorous questioning. Not a single offender was disposed of with merely an admonition; all were sentenced to prison terms ranging from a minimum of six months to a maximum of one year and were immediately taken away under guard. This was, in one respect . . .

First Use of the Measure Anywhere in Korea
Explanation of the Summary Trials

With the aim of eradicating black-market activity that is eating away at the home front, the mass crackdown carried out this time by the Seoul District Court Prosecutors’ Office featured, for the first time, summary trials under the Wartime Special Criminal Law at each enforcement site. Black-market offenders were sentenced at the police stations and immediately sent to prison.

These summary proceedings dispense with a formal trial and judgment in a courtroom and instead allow a judge, after reviewing the case in writing, to order the sentence carried out by summary order. Previously, this procedure had been applied to minor offenses punishable by fines and petty fees. Under the Wartime Special Criminal Law promulgated in March 1943, however, it was made applicable even where a prison sentence of less than one year was imposed. This crackdown marked the first time that this procedure had been invoked. It was also the first occasion anywhere in the Korean judicial system on which judges themselves went to the enforcement sites and issued summary orders there.

Crackdown to Continue . . .

The acts of black-market dealers constitute violations of the Enterprise Licensing Ordinance as well as the Price and Related Controls Ordinance. The former is punishable by up to two years’ imprisonment, while the latter is punishable by up to ten years’ imprisonment ...

Gyeongseong Ilbo (Keijo Nippo) July 24, 1942

A Woman’s Foolish Scheme Fails to Land Her Catch
A 1,000-Yen Bribe in a Plea for Mercy for Her Husband

There was a foolish woman who tried—and failed—to hook a police officer with the hefty sum of 1,000 yen.

Kunimoto Toshiaki, 46 years old, who operated an eating establishment at 106 Yeongdeungpo, Yangpyeong-dong, purchased a bull on March 15 from Cheong Yun-hwan (정윤환, 鄭允煥) of 132 Yanghwa-dong for 650 yen, although its officially fixed maximum price was 360 yen. On the 25th of the same month, he sold it to Yi Hak-sun (이학순, 李學順) of 121 Yangpyeong-dong for 680 yen, thereby making an illicit profit of 320 yen. The matter came to light at Yeongdeungpo Police Station. As he is suspected of having committed additional offenses, he is currently undergoing a rigorous investigation by Mr. Moriyama, an officer of the Economic Section.

One night, however, Kunimoto’s wife, Gye-jeong (계정, 桂貞), 36 years old, secretly visited Policeman Moriyama at his private residence. In tears, she pleaded, “If you would show particular leniency toward my husband for what he has done, I would never forget your kindness for as long as I live…” and then departed.

After she had gone, Moriyama discovered a thick envelope. When he opened it, he found that it contained 1,000 yen in a crisp stack of banknotes. Startled, Moriyama reported the matter to Chief Ishikawa the following morning. Gye-jeong was immediately arrested on a charge of bribery and detained at the police station.

Gyeongseong Ilbo (Keijo Nippo) May 18, 1941

A 1,000-Yen Bribe Hidden Beneath a Seat Cushion
Luck Runs Out at Last for a Gang of Three

[Cheongju] The trial of Takemoto Hiroshi, 45 years old, Kimura Takeo, 20 years old, and Nishihara Taizan, 20 years old, all of Yoshino-chō, Seoul, on charges of violating the Price Control Ordinance and bribery opened at 2 p.m. on May 13th in the courtroom of the Cheongju Branch Court, before Judge Nishiyama, with Prosecutor Mōri in attendance. After about an hour of examination of the facts, Prosecutor Mōri delivered a severe closing argument, seeking a fine of 80 yen for Takemoto, eight months’ imprisonment and a fine of 100 yen for Kimura, and six months’ imprisonment for Nishihara. Defense counsel Iwakiri then presented his argument, and the court adjourned at 3:30 p.m. Sentencing was set for the 16th...

The details of the case were as follows. Kimura was employed as a clerk at a leather factory in Sinseol-dong, Seoul, operated by his brother-in-law Takemoto. In July of last year, he purchased from a certain man surnamed Im (임, 林), of 138 Nambu-chō, Suwon-eup, 214 large dog pelts at two yen each and 66 small dog pelts at one yen 80 sen each, a total of 280 pelts, for 546 yen 80 sen. Instead of supplying them to the military, he resold them to Kim Myeong-su (김명수, 金明洙) of Chuncheon, Gangwon Province.

Then, on March 28 of this year, two workers from the same factory, Kiyomoto Dong-su (동수, 東洙) and Kunimoto Heung-ryeon (흥련, 興連), were arrested at the Shunkyō Inn in Gwancheol-dong in connection with another case by Detectives Itō and Shigeyama of Eumseong Police Station. After witnessing the arrests, Kimura received 2,700 yen from Kiyomoto’s wife, Su-myeong (수명, 壽明), as money to use in securing their release. Together with Nishihara Taizan, he followed the two police officers and arrived in Eumseong on the 29th.

The pair checked into the Toyofuku Inn. At about nine o’clock that night, after discussing what to do, Kimura and Nishihara visited Detective Shigeyama and slipped 1,000 yen beneath the seat cushion on which he was sitting. They then went directly to Detective Itō and, using the same method, placed another 1,000 yen beneath his bedding. After this foolish attempt at bribery, they returned to their inn. The next morning, however, the two officers discovered the respective bundles of banknotes while straightening their bedding. Kimura and Nishihara were immediately arrested that same morning...

After the prosecutor had finished his closing argument, Judge Nishiyama asked the defendants, “Do you have anything to say?” Takemoto and Nishihara merely hung their heads, but Kimura straightened himself and said, “As you know, I am an unmarried man. I can endure the hardship of going to prison, but who will give his daughter in marriage to a man with a criminal record? That is the one thing I cannot bear to think about.” He then broke down in tears.

[Transcription]

京城日報 1945年7月3日

『闇』を撃つ伝家の実力
峻烈、街頭裁判で体刑処分

戦時生活を乱す闇行商の市場が白昼公然と開かれ公定価より数十倍の高値で取引されるのを黙視出来ず京城地方法院検事局では罰金、説諭から今度は取締りを強化して初の戦時刑特別法の現地発動をなし二日判検事が街頭に進出して峻烈なる一斉検挙を行い即決裁判を以て其場から送監した。今後も一斉検挙を波状的に実施し闇の一掃を期し明るい国民食生活を確保する。

此日午後一時、京城府内数ヶ所の闇市場に出動した判、検事は私服警察官の応援を得て一網打尽し、各署で取調の上其場で刑の執行を宣言。之等現行犯は午後四時迄に東大門署管内百二十七名、西大門署六十五名、城東署四十五名、本町署七十六名、麻浦署八十名、城北署七十三名を電車で西大門刑務所に送った。

此違反者は九割までが婦女子、品物は蔬菜が一番多く犯罪者の処断を東大門署に見ると一先ず警察官が取り調べ出張の山口、寺澤両検事が他の係官と共に再調査、直に起訴。相原、飯島両判事が更に厳密な取り調べを行い一人の説諭処分もなく全部を最低六ヶ月、最高一ヶ年の体刑処分が言い渡され即時押送した。之は一面．．．

全鮮初の発動
即決裁判の解説

銃後を蝕む闇行為の剿滅を期し、今回京城地方法院検事局が行った一斉取締には戦時刑特別法による初の即決裁判が各現場で行われ、闇行為者は警察署で刑に服し直に送監された。之は法廷に於ける公判、判決を略し書面審議により判事の略式命令で刑の執行を宣する即決裁判。従来罰金、科料等軽微な犯罪に対して適用されていたが、昭和十八年三月公布の戦時刑特別法により体刑一年未満の場合にも適用することとなり、今回が初の発動であり、判事の現場進出による略式命令は全鮮司法界初めての事でもある。

今後も続行．．．

闇商人の行為は企業許可令違反並びに価格等統制令違反にかかり前者は懲役二年以下、後者は懲役十年以下に処せられる。

京城日報 1942年7月24日

釣り損じた女の浅智恵
夫の命乞いに一千円贈賄

大枚一千円で警察官を釣ろうとして失敗した浅墓な女がある。

永登浦楊坪町一〇六飲食店営業国本俊明（四六）は去る三月十五日楊花町一三二鄭允煥から牡牛一頭（公定最高価格三百六十円）を六百五十円で買受け同二十五日楊坪町一二一李學順に六百八十円で売却し結局三百二十円の不正利得をしたことが永登浦署に発覚。余罪もある見込みで目下森山経済係員の手で厳重取調べ中であるが、国本の妻桂貞（三六）は或る夜秘かに森山巡査の私宅を訪れ『夫の犯行に対し特に寛大な処置をして戴ければその恩は死んで忘れませんから．．．』と涙と共に懇願して立ち去ったが彼女が帰った後で中味の厚い封筒を見つけ開いてみると手の切れるような札束で金千円が封入されてあったので森山巡査は驚いて翌朝石川主任にその旨報告したので桂貞も直ちに贈賄罪として検挙そのまま同署へ留置された。

京城日報 1941年5月18日

座蒲団の下に千円の贈賄
悪運つき三人組遂に挙る

【清州】京城府吉野町武本寛（四五）、木村武雄（二〇）、西原泰山（二〇）の三名にかかる価格統制令違反及贈賄事件の公判は去る十三日午後二時より清州支庁法廷で西山判事係毛利検事立会の上開廷。約一時間に亘る事実審理ののち毛利検事より峻烈な論告があり武本は罰金八十円、木村は懲役八ヶ月及び罰金百円、西原は懲役六ヶ月を夫々求刑。

岩切弁護士の弁論が行われ同三時半閉廷したが判決言渡しは来る十六日．．．

因に事件の内容：木村は義兄武本が経営している京城府新設町皮革工場書記として雇われているうち昨年七月水原邑南部町一三八林某から犬皮（大）一枚につき二円ずつ二百十四枚、同（小）一枚に付一円八十銭ずつ六十六枚計二百八十枚を五百四十六円八十銭で買い入れて軍部に納めず江原道春川邑金明洙に買い飛ばしたほか、本年三月二十八日同工場職工清本東洙及び国本興連の両名が貫鉄町春興旅館で某事件のため陰城警察署伊藤、茂山両刑事に逮捕されたのを見て清本の妻壽明より金二千七百円を運動費として貰い西原泰山と共に前記の両巡査を尾行して二十九日来陰。

当地の豊福旅館に投宿し同夜九時頃木村、西原の両名は種々協議の上、茂山巡査を訪問して金一千円を自分の敷いている座蒲団の下に入れ、その足で伊藤巡査を尋ねて同様手段で敷蒲団の下に又も一千円を入れて浅墓な贈賄を企て宿へ帰ったが、右両巡査は翌朝寝具の整理中それぞれ件の札束を発見。同朝直ちにこれ等二名を逮捕したものである．．．

検事の論告が終って西原判事が被告等に向い”何かいうことはないか”と問えば武本、西原両名はうなだれているばかりであったが、木村は姿勢を正して”私は御承知の通り未婚者であります。懲役に行って苦労するのは辛抱出来ますが、前科者に誰が娘をくれるでしょうか。ただこれだけが残念でたまりません”と泣きくずれていた。

Source: Digital Newspaper Archive, National Library of Korea

“Even prison will not save you”: unmarried young Korean women feared sexual enslavement in Imperial Japan’s wartime labor conscription, but officials said evaders would be imprisoned and then conscripted anyway (September 1944)

By early 1944, months before Japan formally promulgated the Women’s Labor Volunteer Corps Ordinance in August 1944, reports from colonial Korea described young unmarried women rushing into early marriages to avoid labor conscription. Their panic was not irrational. Korean women had already heard widespread reports of abuse associated with wartime labor mobilization, and many evidently feared that being taken away for “labor service” could expose them to sexual exploitation or trafficking.

Some women may have concluded that imprisonment or a heavy fine was still preferable to conscription. The colonial authorities appear to have anticipated precisely that response.

On September 6, 1944, only two weeks after the ordinance was promulgated on August 23, the following informational article warned that women who attempted to evade mobilization would not escape merely by serving a prison sentence or paying a fine. After completing their punishment, they would still be conscripted.

The ordinance gave the Japanese state a formal legal framework for mobilizing unmarried women and girls between the ages of twelve and forty for wartime labor connected to the Imperial Army, Navy, and other state-directed industries. Calling these organizations “volunteer corps” was therefore deeply misleading: participation was backed by criminal penalties, including imprisonment and substantial fines.

What is especially revealing is the article’s evasive tone. Even after the ordinance had been promulgated, it continued to characterize reports about female conscription as false or exaggerated rumors. It suggested that women were panicking largely because they feared low wages, and reassured readers that the ordinance would not be implemented in Korea immediately. In other words, the authorities simultaneously denied or minimized the policy while explaining the punishments awaiting anyone who resisted it.

This article seems to undermine common revisionist claims that the wartime recruitment of Korean women into Imperial Japan's system of sexual exploitation was fundamentally voluntary. It shows Imperial Japan mobilizing women through threats of imprisonment and fines, attempting to prevent evasion, and publicly downplaying the very coercive system it was preparing to enforce.

[Translation]

Gyeongseong Ilbo (Keijo Nippo) September 6, 1944

Misunderstandings and Questions About White Paper Conscription
Roundtable on Labor Conscription
Guidance and Paternal Care Await
You Cannot Escape Even by Paying a Fine

[Telephone report from Haeju] The sight of labor-conscripted warriors bravely fighting on the labor front is the most noble expression of the boundless strength of the mighty Empire’s war power. This “white-paper call-up” is the greatest duty of imperial subjects, second only to military call-up itself.

However, the purpose of national labor conscription has not been thoroughly understood among the general public, and some people have various doubts and misunderstandings. Therefore, the Hwanghae Province bureau of this newspaper invited officials, including Mr. Yamaguchi, chief of the provincial Mining and Industry Department, and held a roundtable discussion on labor conscription.

Participants: Mr. Yamaguchi, chief of the provincial Mining and Industry Department; Mr. Ayano Masa, official of the Labor Affairs Section; Mr. Ichinose, Mayor of Haeju; Mr. Ito, chief of the Social Affairs Section; Mr. Matsumoto, chief of the Labor Affairs Section; Mr. Matsushita, chief of the Haeju Police Station; and the Hwanghae bureau of this newspaper.

Newspaper: First, please explain what labor conscription is, what kinds of people are conscripted, how they are conscripted, and the purpose and method of the system.

Mr. Yamaguchi, chief of the provincial Mining and Industry Department: 

Labor conscription in Korea has a distinctive meaning, compared with labor conscription in mainland Japan, because it is placed alongside military conscription. Military conscription sends all qualified men into the army without distinction between rich and poor. In the same spirit as being called up as a soldier, and with the attitude of answering the call on the home front, qualified persons, without distinction between rich and poor, are to work in vital factories and mines.

There are two types of labor conscription: general labor conscription and conscription of designated age groups. In addition, there is also labor mobilization mediated by public officials, but people seem generally to confuse this with the Patriotic Labor Service Corps.

Mr. Ichinose, Mayor of Haeju: The investigation of those subject to labor conscription has been completed, and lists have been prepared by age. Based on instructions from the Governor-General's Office, the mayors and county heads on the front line issue summonses to those subject to conscription, conduct physical examinations and other detailed investigations, and report to the provincial governor.

If there are more qualified persons than the planned number to be conscripted, then the orders are delivered after drawing lots by the fairest possible method. General labor conscription is carried out with certain persons as the target. In that case, various circumstances are taken into consideration. But conscription of designated age groups, like military conscription, is carried out without being bound by individual circumstances, and qualified persons are to be conscripted.

Newspaper: It seems that exemption orders from labor conscription have been issued.

Mr. Yamaguchi, chief of the provincial Mining and Industry Department: Even now, in general labor conscription, various circumstances are being taken into account. As for exemption orders, we have not officially received instructions from the Governor-General's Office.

Newspaper: I think there are cases where considerable numbers are taken even from non-conscripted factories, mines, and other workplaces. Since such places are directly contributing to the strengthening of military power, it would be somewhat troublesome if workers were taken from them. Are there any special measures?

Mr. Ichinose, Mayor of Haeju: Conscription of designated age groups is unavoidable, but in the case of general labor conscription, we will take full care so that production will not be reduced.

Newspaper: Rumors are spreading that women will also be conscripted, and public sentiment is unsettled. Will the Women's Labor Volunteer Corps Ordinance also be applied in Korea?

Mr. Yamaguchi, chief of the provincial Mining and Industry Department: Conditions in Korea differ from those in mainland Japan, so it is not a matter of applying it immediately. Rather, since there is a large source of male labor, the first thing is to thoroughly strengthen male labor mobilization. As for women, one can think of them engaging in agriculture in place of men, or taking up labor actively. I think people may be confusing this with male labor conscription.

Newspaper: It seems that the purpose of labor conscription has not been fully understood.

Mr. Ito, chief of the Social Affairs Section: That is certainly true. The Labor Conscription Ordinance was promulgated in July 1939, and the Military Conscription Ordinance was promulgated in August 1943. Yet the purpose of the older law, the Labor Conscription Ordinance, has not been thoroughly understood and is generally feared. I think people may suspect that, if they are conscripted, they will be used for low wages, because the relief and assistance laws have not been fully understood. This is partly because the authorities have not done enough publicity.

Newspaper: I think the Military Conscription Ordinance is well understood because it had already been tested through the volunteer soldier system. What punishment is there for those who evade labor conscription?

Mr. Matsushita, Haeju Police chief: The policy is strict punishment. However, at present there have been no outrageous persons who fled after receiving an order.

Mr. Ayano Masa, official of the Labor Affairs Section: The law says that those who evade labor conscription are subject to imprisonment for up to one year or a fine of up to 1,000 yen. Apparently there are some misguided people who think that, once they have served the sentence or paid the fine, they can escape labor conscription. But once the imprisonment is finished, they will immediately be conscripted. In other words, they will have earned priority for conscription.

Newspaper: Please explain concretely the treatment of conscripted laborers.

Mr. Ayano Masa: Under the Wage Control Ordinance, basic wages have been established by age. Suppose a person who had been receiving 100 yen is conscripted and receives only 70 yen. If he submits to the company or factory a declaration recognized by the mayor and police chief, then the company or factory will separately provide relief assistance for the difference. In addition, welfare facilities are complete, so there is nothing to worry about.

Newspaper: What about the activities of workers supplied to mainland Japan two or three years ago?

Mr. Matsumoto, chief of the Labor Affairs Section: The year before last, I visited Ōtani Heavy Industries and four other places. In each case, they were people from our home district whom I had recruited and mediated for. They were receiving double the pay, and many workers were very pleased to receive an average of 120 yen. Some returned because of illness, but among those who have now returned to Korea after completing their terms, some are even saying that they want to go back to their former factories.

Newspaper: It would be good to clearly inform people in advance where they will be sent for labor conscription.

Mr. Ichinose, Mayor of Haeju: From the standpoint of counter-espionage, the authorities seem hesitant about that. It is written in the labor summons.

Mr. Ito, chief of the Social Affairs Section: If the company has welfare and benefit facilities in place and provides guidance with paternal care, then people will gladly go. On this point, the Governor-General's Office is making firm arrangements with the Ministry of Welfare.

Newspaper: Please explain concretely the relief and support for conscripted laborers.

Mr. Ichinose, Mayor of Haeju: This time, two people from the city office and two or three town council clerks will also be going. I treat labor conscription in the same spirit as military conscription, based on the purpose of the system. Naturally, that is how it must be.

Mr. Ito, chief of the Social Affairs Section: A person does not lose his previous status because of labor conscription. For example, when a government official is conscripted, he is made to answer the call while retaining his current official status, and even during the period of labor conscription, the years count toward his pension. At companies, too, it is only natural that the period of labor conscription should be included in the calculation of years of service.

Mr. Ichinose, Mayor of Haeju: In order to make relief for conscripted laborers complete, the city intends to establish a relief association like the Military Relief Association, assign specialized staff, and entrust the work in town councils to enthusiastic people, so that all possible measures are taken.

Newspaper: Is there any possibility that the period of labor conscription will be extended?

Mr. Yamaguchi, chief of the provincial Mining and Industry Department: Within Korea, it is two years, while in mainland Japan it is one year. The period is absolutely not to be extended. One year means strictly one year.

Mr. Ito, chief of the Social Affairs Section: The labor conscription period is at most two years. The state never lies. There is no need to worry about such things.

Newspaper: If a parent or sibling is critically ill, or if a family member is sick, will the conscripted person be allowed to return home?

Mr. Ayano Masa, official of the Labor Affairs Section: He will be allowed to return, and even his travel expenses will be paid. However, in such cases, it must be by official telegram.

Mr. Ichinose, Mayor of Haeju: The mayor or county head is to certify it, so people should apply without hesitation.

Newspaper: If a person becomes ill during labor conscription, will he be allowed to recuperate at home?

Mr. Ayano Masa, official of the Labor Affairs Section: Of course. In that case, the labor conscription will be canceled.

Mr. Yamaguchi, chief of the provincial Mining and Industry Department: Labor conscription is placed alongside military conscription. It is a home-front call-up, and at the same time it is a great harvest in the training of Imperial subjects. Without distinction between rich and poor, and regardless of whether one has education or not, people are conscripted just like soldiers. Therefore, they must steel themselves to be called up gladly.

Mr. Ayano Masa, official of the Labor Affairs Section: In one county, a labor affairs official himself was qualified and was conscripted this time. Precisely because the authorities conduct labor conscription fairly and openly, the general public must absolutely trust the authorities and gladly rush forward to the honor of answering the call on the home front.

Newspaper: Are there any inspiring stories about labor conscription?

Mr. Ichinose, Mayor of Haeju: Two or three days ago, a young man rushed into the mayor’s office and pleaded, “Please conscript me without fail.” He was a reliable young man who had already received his papers and currently had a job. At a time when there are outrageous people trying to evade labor conscription, I was deeply moved. At the very least, I want people to answer labor conscription with the same spirit of service and vigor as this young man.

[Transcription]

京城日報 1944年9月6日

”白紙”の誤解と疑問
徴用座談会
待っている指導と親心
罰金を払っても免かれない

【海州電話】徴用戦士が勇躍勤労戦線に敢闘する姿こそ最も尊く、逞しい帝国の戦力の無限な力強さで、この白紙応召こそ応召に準ずる帝国臣民の最大義務である。然るに国民徴用というものの趣旨が一般に徹底せず種々な疑問や誤解を抱いているものがあるので、本社黄海道総局では山口道鉱工部長以下当局者を招き徴用に対する座談会を開催した。

出席者：山口道鉱工部長、勤務課綾野屬、一瀬海州府尹、伊藤社会課長、松本労務主任、松下海州署長、本社黄海総局

本社：先ず徴用とはどんなものか、どんな人がどんな風に徴用されるか、その趣旨や方法について御説明を．．．

山口鉱工部長：朝鮮の徴用は徴兵と対象するところに内地の徴用と特異的な意味がある。徴兵は貧富の差別なく適格者は皆兵隊に行く。その兵に召されるのと同じ気持で銃後応召の精神を以て緊要な重用工場、鉱山で貧富の差別なく適格者は働いて貰う。徴用には一般徴用と指定年齢層徴用の二種類がある。このほかに官斡旋の労務動員もあるが、一般に勤労報国隊と混同しているようだ。

一瀬海州府尹：徴用該当者の調査が済み年齢別に名簿が出来ている。本府の指令に基き第一線の府尹、郡守が徴用対象者に出頭命令書を出し身体検査その他を細密を調査して道知事に報告する。徴用予定人数に比して適格者が多い場合は最も公平な方法で抽籤して令書を伝達する。一般徴用は一定の人間を対象として徴用が行われる。この場合は各般の事情を考慮するが指定年齢層の徴用は徴兵と同じく個人の事情に拘泥せず適格者は徴用することになっている。

本社：徴用免除令が出たようだが．．．

山口鉱工部長：一般徴用はいまでも諸般の事情を加減している。免除令は正式に本府から指令を受けていない。

本社：非徴用工場、鉱山その他事業所でも相当抜かれる場合もあると思う。これは直接戦力増強に貢献しているからとられると一寸困ると思うが、何か特別の対策はないか．．．

一瀬府尹：指定年齢層の徴用は已むを得ないが、一般徴用は充分に考慮して生産の低下を来すようなことのないように万全を期する。

本社：女子も徴用するとのデマが飛び人心が動揺しているが、女子挺身隊令は朝鮮にも適用するか．．．

山口鉱工部長：朝鮮は内地の事情とは違うからいますぐというわけにはいかない。それよりも男子の労務給源が多いから男子の労務強化を徹底強化することであるが、女子は男子に代って農業に従事するとか、積極的に勤労することが考えられる。男子の徴用と混同しているのではないかと思う。

本社：徴用の趣旨が徹底を欠いているようだが．．．

伊藤社会課長：確かにそうだ。徴用令は十四年七月発布され、徴兵令は十八年八月発布されたが、古くから出た法令の徴用令の趣旨は徹底せず一般に恐れられている。援護法が徹底せず徴用されると安い賃銀で使われるのではないかとの疑惧を抱いているのではないかと思う。それというものは当局の宣伝が足らなかったためもあるが．．．

本社：徴兵令は志願兵制度で試験済みだから徹底しているのだと思う。徴用を忌避するものの処罰は．．．

松下海州署長：厳罰方針だ。然し令書の伝達を受けて逃走した不届者はいまのところはない。

綾野屬：徴用を忌避するものは一年以下の懲役、一千円以下の罰金ーとあるので、それさえ済めば徴用を免れるのだという不心得ものがあるらしいが、これは懲役がすんだらすぐ徴用する。まあ徴用の優先権を獲得するわけだ。

本社：応徴士の待遇問題について具体的な説明を承りたい．．．

綾野屬：賃銀統制令により年齢別に基本賃金が制定している百円貰っていた人が徴用されて七十円しか貰えないという場合は府尹、署長の認めた申告書を会社、工場に提出すれば、その会社、工場から差額だけは別に援護補給することになっている。このほかに厚生施設も完全であり心配するようなことはない。

本社：二、三年前に内地へ供出した工員の活躍状況について。

松本労務主任：一昨年大谷重工業ほか四ヶ所を廻ってみた。何れも自分が募集し斡旋した郷土出身者で給料も倍額貰っており平均百二十円も貰っている工員が多く非常に喜んでいた。病気で帰ったものも中にはいるが、こんど満期解除で帰鮮したもので又もとの工場に行きたいと申出るものもあるような状態だ。

本社：徴用の行先を前以てはっきり知らせるとよういと思うが。

一瀬海州府尹：防諜上当局としても躊躇するようだ。令書に書き入れてある。

伊藤課長：福利、厚生施設が整っており親心を以て指導するような会社なら喜んで行く。この点は本府で厚生省としっかと打ち合せている。

本府：応徴士の援護について具体的な説明を．．．

一瀬海州府尹：今回府からも二人、町会書記も二、三人出るが私は徴用の趣旨から徴兵と同じ気持で取扱っている。また当然そうでなければならぬ。

伊藤課長：徴用によって徴用前の身分を失うようなことはない。例えば官吏が徴用されたときは現官のまま応徴せしめ徴用期間中といえども恩給年数が通算される。会社でも勤続年数を徴用期間を含んで通算することは当然だ。

一瀬海州府尹：府としては応徴者援護の完璧を期するため軍人援護会のように援護会を設け専門の職員を置き町会には熱のある人にこれを委嘱し万全を期したい。

本社：徴用期間を延長するようなことはないか．．．

山口鉱工部長：朝鮮内は二年だが、内地は一年ということになっている。期間は絶対に延長しないことになっている。一年は厳格なる一年だ．．．

伊藤課長：徴用期間は長くて二年である。国は決して嘘はいわない。こんなことには心配しなくてよいと思う。

本社：親兄弟が危篤だとか家族に病気しているものがあれば帰して貰えるか。

綾野屬：旅費まで支給して帰して貰える。但しこの場合には公電に限る。

一瀬海州府尹：府尹郡守が証明することになっているから遠慮なく申出ればよい。

本社：徴用中病気にかかった場合には帰宅療養を許すが．．．

綾野屬：勿論許す。この場合には徴用は解除される。

山口鉱工部長：徴用というものは徴兵と対象して銃後応召であると同時に皇民の錬成になるという大きな収穫であり、貧富の差別なく学問のあるとないと問わず兵隊と同じく徴用されるのだから喜んで召される気持を固めることだ。

綾野屬：或る郡で労務係員が適格者で今回徴用された事実がある。それだけに官としては公明正大に徴用するのだから一般は絶対に当局を信じ銃後応召の栄誉に欣然馳せ参じねばならぬ。

本社：徴用美談は．．．

一瀬海州府尹：二、三日前府尹室に飛び込み”私を是非徴用して下さい”と嘆願する一青年があった。最後も出ているし現在職をもっているしっかりした青年で徴用を忌避しようとする不届者があるとき私は非常に感激した。少なくともこの青年のような奉公心と気魄をもって応徴して貰いたい。

Source: Digital Newspaper Archive, National Library of Korea

See also:

• In 1944, Imperial Japan formally conscripted almost all unmarried Korean women ages 12-40 into a forced labor system that had already been used for years to traffic laborers into sex slavery according to testimonies of former comfort women (link)
• Terrified by rumors of forced labor conscription under the Imperial Army, young Korean women rushed into marriages to escape, prompting officials to hold April 1944 press conference to deny and deflect (link)

In 1944, Imperial Japan formally conscripted almost all unmarried Korean women ages 12-40 into a forced labor system that had already been used for years to traffic laborers into sex slavery according to testimonies of former comfort women

On August 23, 1944, Imperial Japan promulgated the Women's Labor Volunteer Corps Ordinance. This ordinance gave the state a formal legal framework to mobilize unmarried women and girls, ages 12 to 40, for wartime labor with the Imperial Army and Navy. According to this news article, those who refused could first be issued a labor-service order, then an “employment order,” and if they still refused, they could face up to one year in prison or a fine of up to 1,000 yen.

The article is striking because it openly admits what had changed. About four months before this ordinance, women’s “volunteer corps” had been organized through government guidance and encouragement. After August 1944, the system was backed by the National General Mobilization Act, with legal penalties for refusal. In other words, the “volunteer” label remained, but the legal reality became compulsory mobilization.

This also connects to an earlier news article from April 22, 1944, which I have also transcribed and translated below. That article reported a sudden surge in early marriages in the Dongdaemun Police Station district. Marriage-service businesses in the area were recording sharp increases in wedding registrations, and the article noted that the ages of brides and grooms had dropped. Some girls getting married were only fifteen or sixteen, and many were seventeen to twenty.

The April article explained the panic bluntly: rumors were spreading that women, too, would be conscripted for labor. In an April 1944 press conference, officials tried to calm the public by insisting that “women will absolutely not be conscripted” and urged people not to rush into “unnatural” marriages merely to avoid mobilization.

Four months later, that reassurance was effectively broken. The August ordinance formally targeted unmarried women and girls from age 12 to 40. Before this ordinance, young Korean men were served with white-paper (hakushi, 白紙) summonses to send them as compulsory labor to factories, farms, and construction sites under the guise of patriotic training.  This time, however, the white-paper summons started being served to young unmarried Korean women as well.

It may be that the panic spread, because word was getting out from the frontlines that at least some women who "volunteered" for labor with the Imperial military were being forced into sex work, and stories from sex trafficking victims were finally becoming widely known in the Korean public through the word of mouth. 

It turns out that there was at least one former Korean comfort woman who may  have been recruited through something similar to the White Paper conscription system of the August 1944 Women's Labor Volunteer Corps Ordinance. Let's look into the PDF file from the Korea Verband containing the testimonies of eight comfort women (link). Six of the eight testimonies describe some form of police or official involvement in the initial recruitment or abduction process.  Here is what Kim Bok-dong had to say about how she was recruited:

"I remember it was one day in the spring of 1941 when I was fifteen. A Japanese man in yellow clothes visited my house with a village-head and told my mother to send me to 'daishin tai' for the empire, since she had no son. Otherwise, he added, my family would be traitors and unable to live here. He also said that 'daishin tai' meant to go to work at a workshop producing army uniforms. He forced my mother to sign on the document. Despite my mother’s resistance, I ended up being drafted in this way."

On the one hand, if "daishin tai" refers to teishintai (挺身隊) - Labor Volunteer Corps - then her testimony seems to be consistent with a police representative serving her with a labor summons in accordance with the August 1944 ordinance. On the other hand, because Kim's account places the event in 1941, this seems inconsistent with recruitment under the August 1944 ordinance. There is a possibility that labor summons were already being served to Korean women as far back as 1941, and the August 1944 ordinance was merely formalizing a practice that had already been used on an informal basis.

According to another former Korean comfort woman, Ahn Jeomsun, calling up unmarried Korean women for compulsory labor was already going on 1942, two years before the August 1944 ordinance. She testified that she was forced into sex work with the Imperial military after she responded to an announcement asking all unmarried girls in the neighborhood to gather together:

"The year came when I turned thirteen, and it was fall. At that time the Pacific War had been going on for a while. It was 1942. The head of the neighborhood organization made an anouncement over the loudspeaker, asking all unmarried girls from one age to another (I can't remember precisely) to meet in front of the Boksagol neighborhood rice mill. Mother heard the announcement, and suggested we go together to see what it was all about ... Besides the neighborhood people, there were Japanese soldiers in uniform, Japanese in civilian clothes, and other Koreans. Those girls were all being weighed on the rice scale one by one. Tall girls and healthy ones were being put in a truck. Japanese soldiers were putting the girls in the truck, lifting them up."

This is yet another clue that suggests that the August 1944 ordinance may have merely been formalizing practices that were already being used long before the ordinance was promulgated. 

The ordinance included exemptions for illness, disability, and women who were the “central support” of their household. Marriage also removed women from the category of “unmarried women” targeted by the ordinance. But for young girls, especially those aged 12 to 17, marriage was hardly a realistic or humane form of protection. The result was that unmarried Korean women and girls in the final years of Japanese colonial rule faced a greatly expanded risk of coercive state mobilization and sexual abuse, with refusal backed by criminal punishment.

[Translation]

Gyeongseong Ilbo (Keijo Nippo), August 23, 1944

The Hands and Strength of Unmarried Women
Hearing from Vice Minister of Welfare Aikawa
Contents of the Labor Ordinance
Those Who Refuse Will Receive a Separate White Paper Conscription Order

[Telephone report from Tokyo] The Ministry of Welfare will promulgate the Women’s Labor Volunteer Corps Ordinance on August 23rd, and it will go into effect the same day. At this grave moment in the war situation, the production front, pressing forward in arms production, is powerfully calling for the hands of unmarried women.

At present, the nations at war are each carrying out thoroughgoing labor mobilization with the full force of the state. Germany has begun a total mobilization, sending even women up to the age of fifty into factories. Britain, at the same time as the outbreak of war, issued a conscription order covering women up to the age of forty. In the United States, large numbers of women are even being mobilized into the armed forces.

In all of these countries, mobilization is focused solely on labor capacity, and women are mobilized without distinction between housewives and daughters. However, under the Women’s Labor Ordinance now being promulgated, warm consideration is being given to the role of the “household,” and the order is limited only to women without spouses.

Under this ordinance, those who ignore the demands of the state and refuse mobilization will be issued a white paper employment order. For those who still do not comply, the final means of punishment, namely imprisonment or a fine, has also been prepared. We asked Vice Minister of Welfare Aikawa about the main points of this Labor Ordinance.

Question: Who will be subject to the Volunteer Corps?

Answer: Those registered under the National Vocational Ability Reporting Ordinance; in other words, unmarried women from the age of twelve through forty.

Question: From a legal standpoint, how does this differ from the Volunteer Corps up to now?

Answer: Until now, “corps” have been formed through government guidance and encouragement. This time, however, it will be done under an ordinance based on the National General Mobilization Act, so there will be strict penalties for those who evade or fail to comply without reason.

Question: Who will be excluded?

Answer: Military civilian employees of the Army and Navy; employees of government offices; employees of factories or workplaces under government control or designation; those engaged in general mobilization work, such as metal refining workers and agricultural personnel; those who form the central support of household life; and those who are sickly or disabled. The interpretation of “central support” refers to people who, according to sound social common sense, would reasonably be recognized as such. For example, it means someone whose mother has died or is seriously ill, and who is in fact acting in the place of the housewife.

Question: Under what circumstances will someone be released from the obligation?

Answer: For example, if her marriage arrangements are settled and she marries, if she develops an illness that makes her unable to endure labor, or if an elder sister who had been acting in the place of the housewife is no longer there and the person herself must take her place, then she will be released simply upon application.

Question: Until now, there have been people who had to join the Volunteer Corps while others did not, giving rise to a sense of unfairness. How will things be from now on?

Answer: First, a written Labor Volunteer Service Order will be handed over. Those who do not mobilize in response to it will then be given an “employment order.” Anyone who fails to obey that order will, under the National General Mobilization Act, be punished by imprisonment for up to one year or a fine of up to 1,000 yen. Also, depending on actual circumstances, women currently working at banks or companies of lower urgency may be ordered to join and mobilize with the women’s corps.

Gyeongseong Ilbo (Keijo Nippo), April 22, 1944

Toward Proper Marriage
The Streets Are Flooded with Early-Marriage Couples

It is said that marriages have been increasing, but to what extent? Let us take a look at the marriage situation within the jurisdiction of the Dongdaemun Police Station since the Greater East Asia War began.

It is true that the number has been rising day by day. Looking at the figures, the Oriental Ceremonial Department handled 123 cases in fiscal 1942, 160 cases in fiscal 1943, and 102 cases from January of this year through April 20. The Donam-dong Beauty Ceremonial Department handled 48 cases in fiscal 1942, 86 cases in fiscal 1943, and already 82 cases from January of this year through April 20, nearly the same number as in the whole previous year. In each case, the increase this year has been sharp.

What deserves attention is that, until around this time last year, the marriage age was mostly 22/23 to 25/26 for men, and 19 to 21/22 for women. Since January of this year, however, the marriage age has fallen for both men and women. Many of the men are now 18/19 to 22/23, while among the women there are even extreme cases of 15- or 16-year-olds, with the majority being from 17/18 to 20 years old.

It is, of course, a happy thing to hold a proper wedding in line with the national policy of “give birth and multiply.” However, there is a sense that some are being carried along by rumors that, along with general conscription, women too will be conscripted, and are rushing into unnatural marriages in order to escape conscription. Since women will absolutely not be conscripted, the authorities are calling on the public to be careful and to hold proper marriages.

[Transcription]

京城日報 1944年8月23日

未婚女性の手と力
相川厚生次官に聴く
勤労令の内容
拒む者は別の白紙

【東京電話】厚生省では女子勤労挺身隊令を二十三日公布、即日実施することとなった。戦局の重大の秋に兵器生産に邁進する生産人は未婚女性の手を力強く呼び求めている。いま交戦各国はそれぞれ国を挙げ徹底的な勤労動員を断行。ドイツでは五十歳までの女子をも工場に送るという根こそぎ動員を開始。英国も開戦と同時に婦人四十歳までを含む徴用令を発布。米国では女子を軍隊にも多数出動している。

これらの国々の動員事情は何れも稼働ということにのみ主眼が置かれ、主婦と娘の区別なく動員されているが、この度公布される女子勤労令では『家庭』の役割を考慮して無配偶女子にのみに限るという温い配慮が払われている。

これには国の要請を無視して出動を拒む者には就職令出動の白紙が発生せられるが、これにも従わないものに対しては体刑か罰金に処するという最後手段の用意もあるというのがこの法令である。この勤労令の主なる点はどういうところかとの問に対して相川厚生次官に答えて貰おう。

問：どういうものが挺身隊の対象となるか。

答：国民職業能力申告令による国民登録者すなわち満十二歳以上四十歳までの無配偶女子である。

問：これまでの挺身隊とは法律の上からみてどう違うか。

答：従来は政府の指導奨励によって『隊』を作って来たが、こんどは国家総動員法に基く法令によることになったので、理由なく忌避したり応じない者には強い罰則がある。

問：どういうものが除外されるか。

答：陸海軍軍属、官衙、政府管理あるいは指定の工場、事業場の従業員、金属製錬業や農業要員などの総動員業務に従事している者、および家庭生活の根軸となっている者および病弱、不具者などである。『根軸』の解釈は円満な社会通念で無理もないと思われる人で、例えば母親が死亡あるいは重病で当人が事実上主婦代りをしているような者を指す。

問：どういう時に解除されるか。

答：たとえば当人の縁談が整い結婚するとか勤労に耐えないような病状になった時、あるいは家庭の主婦代りを勤めていた姉がいなくなり当人がこれに代るような時は願出により簡単に解除される。

問：いまでは挺身隊に加わらなければならない者があり、不公平の向があったが、これからはどうか。

答：最初挺身勤労令書の白紙が渡され、それに出動しない者には『就職令書』が追って渡され、この命令に従わない者には総動員法により一年以下の懲役あるいは一千円以下の罰金に処せられる。又緊要度の低い銀行会社に現に働いている者は実情によっては女子隊に加入出動するように命ずる時もある。

京城日報 1944年4月22日

正当な結婚へ
街は早婚組の氾濫

結婚が増えて来たというが、どの程度だろう。ここに大東亜戦後の東大門署管内の結婚状況を覗いてみよう。日増しに増加の一途を辿っているのは事実だが、件数で調べて見ると東洋礼式部は十七年度が百二十三件、十八年度が百六十件、本年正月から四月二十日までに百二件に達している。敦岩町美容礼式部が十七年度には四十八件、十八年度は八十六件、本年正月から昨二十日までがすでに前年一ヶ年間の件数と略同数の八十二件で何れも本年に入り激増を示している。

注目すべき点は去年の今頃までの婚姻年齢は男は二十二、三才から二十五、六才で、女は十九才から二十一、二才までが殆ど大部分であったが今年一月以来は結婚年齢が男女ともに低下し男は十八、九才から二十二、三才の者が多く女は甚だしいのは十五、六才の者もあり大半は十七、八才から二十才までの者という現状である。

”生めよ殖せよ”の国策の線に沿うし正当な結婚を挙げるのはお目出たいが、一般徴用に伴い女子にも徴用があるという噂に乗ぜられて徴用をまぬかれようと不自然な結婚を急ぐ感があるので女子は絶対に徴用せぬから正しき結婚を挙げるよう一般の注意を要望している。

Source: Digital Newspaper Archive, National Library of Korea

See also:

• Terrified by rumors of forced labor conscription under the Imperial Army, young Korean women rushed into marriages to escape, prompting officials to hold April 1944 press conference to deny and deflect (link)
• ‘Selfless’ Imperial Japanese policeman visits pregnant Korean mother daily and delivers her baby after forcing her husband into Imperial war service: a 1945 ‘heartwarming’ propaganda tale (link)
• Koreans tried to bribe their way out of Imperial Japan’s forced labor conscription, but patriotic student informants turned them in (June 1945) (link)
• Testimonies of former Comfort Women from Korea Verband (link)

Imperial Japan hunted shortwave listeners in colonial Korea: 246 people investigated and 50 radios seized by Inspector Saiga Shichirō, a notorious torturer accused of fabricating cases and sending detainees to their deaths (1942–44)

During World War II, Imperial Japan banned the use of shortwave radios, which tech savvy Koreans were apparently using to secretly listen to the Korean-language service of the Voice of America, which began broadcasting in August 1942. Doing so was extremely risky, since anyone who was caught by Imperial military police faced detention by Inspector Saiga Shichirō, who was notorious for fabricating cases and brutally torturing and killing detainees.

By 1944, a few hundred Koreans were arrested for shortwave radio offenses. Thus, the number of shortwave listeners was probably extremely small, numbering maybe only a few hundred in a population of over 25 million. Nevertheless, it is a testament to the insecurities of the totalitarian regime that it went to such great lengths to crack down on such a tiny circle of listeners, presumably because uncensored news about the war threatened its monopoly over information and challenged its control over the minds of the Korean people. The ominous final paragraphs of the article, hinting at further rounds of arrests, appear calculated to frighten anyone who might still have been listening.

Also reproduced here is a news advertisement from the July 20, 1938, issue of Keijo Nippo newspaper illustrating an example of an AM radio set, which might have been modified by Korean hackers to receive shortwave signals. This particular model is a Sharp M-3 radio set manufactured by Hayakawa Electric, a precursor of the modern Sharp Corporation.

By the late 1930s, technology had progressed enough that the size of the radio sets had shrunk to that of a toaster, and only four vacuum tubes were required to operate it. But the four vacuum tubes had to be specific types: UZ 57, UX 26B, UX 12A, and KX 12F. It is a testament to the resilience and technical expertise of this underground Korean radio hacker community that they were still able to scrounge up enough parts amid wartime shortages and work clandestinely under the noses of the vigilant Imperial police and its informants to even be able to listen to the shortwave broadcasts from the U.S. and breach the regime's information blockade.

I am also documenting four other articles demonstrating just how closely radio ownership and listening were controlled in colonial Korea. Receiver installations required official permission, and the authorities periodically threatened to prosecute people who listened without authorization. I also included articles from 1942 and 1943 reminding the Korean people of the ongoing ban on shortwave radio. 

[Translation]

Gyeongseong Ilbo (Keijo Nippo), November 25, 1944

Criminals Who Leave No Trail
Meeting Technical Skill with Technical Skill
Inspector Saiga’s Keen Instinct for Uncovering Clandestine Shortwave Listening

In a remarkably short period of only six months, Inspector Saiga Shichirō of the Special Higher Police Section of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Department apprehended [redacted] persons involved in clandestinely listening to shortwave broadcasts and seized fifty radio sets. These traitorous individuals had allowed themselves to be captivated by enemy schemes and, posing as well-informed persons, had spread false broadcasts throughout the community as though they were true. For his outstanding achievement in forestalling such subversive activity, Saiga received Korea’s first Police Distinguished Service Award. We asked him to describe the full scope of clandestine shortwave listening.

“While investigating a particular rumor case, we traced it to information that ordinarily could not have been obtained in Korea. Suspecting that shortwave radio was undoubtedly involved, we extended our investigation in every direction, examining connections with dealers as well as with technicians. I shall never forget that we began the investigation on the Day of the Imperial Rescript on February 8, 1943.”

“Even the largest case sounds perfectly simple once it has been solved, but making the arrests was anything but easy. If someone is transmitting radio waves, the source can be located with detection equipment. Reception, however, is different. We had to consider the equipment, its outward appearance, and other circumstances together, identify suspicious persons, and then proceed to arrest them. In practice, this was an extremely difficult problem.”

“As our surveillance expanded, their methods became more ingenious. A set might outwardly be a model certified by the Broadcasting Corporation, while its interior had been skillfully modified, allowing the owner to feign complete innocence. We started seizing actual radio sets only in February. As the investigation became more severe in April and May, suspects began burying receivers in the ground or dividing their component parts into three or four separate hiding places. Even when our preliminary investigation had already secured conclusive evidence, we sometimes had to search a house three times before finally discovering a single component. Technically speaking, their methods were quite sophisticated.”

Inspector Saiga’s skill in dealing with shortwave equipment, relentlessly examining even the smallest and most ordinary-looking component, was cultivated during his military service thirty years ago. As a signals soldier, Private First Class Saiga underwent extensive technical training and devoted himself to operational communications during the Siberian Intervention. By a curious turn of fate, the confidence he gained in those skills has now proved of great value in the Greater East Asia War.

“Even an ordinary radio is difficult to hear when improperly adjusted. With shortwave, clandestine listening is impossible without at least some technical knowledge. Anyone who succeeded in listening had probably ruined one or two radios while learning. From a technical standpoint, therefore, the offenders came from the so-called intelligentsia: people with wireless expertise, people who had studied it at school, or radio dealers.”

“From the police standpoint, the investigation proceeded by following rumors back toward their sources. But the trail often broke off midway and could not easily be followed. People often speak of arrests proceeding 'like pulling up a sweet-potato vine,' with one suspect leading to another, but matters were not so simple in this case.”

“There was, however, technical cooperation among the listeners. One member might say to another, 'I haven't been able to listen very well with mine in recent days. What could be wrong with it? Take a quick look at it for me.'”

“Of the 246 persons who became involved in the investigation, [redacted] persons were convicted. Among them were some pitiable cases, including persons who listened because close relatives were living in the continental United States and they were anxious about their safety. Nevertheless, unlawful equipment remains unlawful equipment, and they had to face the judgment of the law.”

“There was also one admirable person who, despite being exposed to outrageous falsehoods, maintained an iron resolve and personally rejected the subversive rumors.”

“Although women are ordinarily associated with criminal cases, none appeared to have been involved in clandestine shortwave listening. This may have been because of the technical knowledge that the activity required.”

Inspector Saiga believes that the practice has probably been eradicated in terms of its overall scale, but that truly malicious individuals may still be listening secretly. Perhaps he is already devising confidential plans for a second and third round of arrests.

“Work that anyone can undertake can be left to others. I do what no one else will attempt,” says Inspector Saiga. What will be the next achievement credited to him?

Gyeongseong Ilbo (Keijo Nippo), June 29, 1943

Controls on the Sale of Radio Receivers

As stronger restrictions on the supply and demand of important materials have made radio receivers and their components increasingly difficult to obtain, the Communications Bureau has decided to regulate their distribution and sale. Therefore, Mr. Fukagawa, chief of the bureau’s Supervisory Section, issued the following statement:

“The allocation of materials for radio receivers and components has recently become considerably tighter. Consequently, we can no longer supply people who wish to use a high-grade receiver merely as an ornament in a room or who unnecessarily install two or more sets.”

“From now on, distribution will be controlled according to a one-receiver-per-household principle, with the objective of making simple and inexpensive receivers widely available. Specifically:”

“1. Requests will not be accepted from persons who already possess a receiver and wish to purchase an additional one, or who wish to purchase a more advanced receiver.”

“2. In places where broadcasts can be received easily, such as cities in which broadcasting stations are located and nearby areas, only simple, inexpensive receivers will be sold, and the sale of high-grade receivers will be prohibited.”

“We particularly ask everyone not to leave the nation’s precious resources sitting idle, but to put them to effective use for listening. If a receiver is no longer needed, please transfer it to someone who requires one. Those possessing two or more receivers should transfer any unnecessary sets to others so that they may be put to use. We also ask listeners to carefully handle the receivers that they are presently using.”

Gyeongseong Ilbo (Keijo Nippo), June 26, 1943

The Growing Number of Radio Listeners
Unlicensed Listeners Should Complete the Required Procedures Immediately

Under the conditions of the Greater East Asia War, in which every day is a decisive battle, radio has cast off its former entertainment-centered role. It has become an indispensable part of national life and an important weapon for defending the home front.

The number of listeners continues to rise rapidly. During the five-day period, 6,372 new applications were submitted. On the other hand, 4,976 listening registrations were terminated because receivers had been sold, had broken down, or because their owners had moved elsewhere within or outside Korea. This produced a net increase of 1,396, bringing the total number of registered listeners to 270,854.

A considerable number of people, however, are still listening without having obtained permission, or have reported that they have discontinued listening while continuing to do so. The Communications Bureau, acting in coordination with the Broadcasting Corporation, will shortly conduct simultaneous arrests for these unlawful installations.

Because unlawful radio installations are subject to severe punishment under the Electronic Telecommunications Act, the Communications Bureau urges anyone who has not yet obtained permission to complete the required procedures immediately.

Gyeongseong Ilbo (Keijo Nippo), March 12, 1943

Shortwave Receivers Are Forbidden
Anyone Possessing One Must Report It Immediately

Across the skies of the world, a battle of radio waves is unfolding that nothing can obstruct. Radio waves, as “invisible bullets,” transcend time and distance to strike at the heart of the enemy.

The enemy, groaning under defeat, is attempting to compensate for its military disadvantage through schemes and propaganda conducted by radio broadcast. It is expected to intensify its false propaganda in the future in an effort to disrupt our home front.

For this reason, the Communications Bureau prohibited last summer the use of equipment capable of intercepting enemy false broadcasts, namely, shortwave receivers. Perhaps because radio listeners in Korea have not fully understood the purpose of the prohibition, some have failed to report their sets and have continued listening secretly without obtaining permission. More than ten such persons have already been uncovered.

The Communications Bureau urges anyone who has a shortwave receiver in his possession to come forward voluntarily before being discovered and punished.

Gyeongseong Ilbo (Keijo Nippo), September 9, 1942

Shortwave Reception Absolutely Prohibited
Severe Punishment for Unreported Listening

Do you possess a shortwave receiver or an all-wave receiver?

For counterespionage reasons under the present wartime conditions, such receivers are absolutely prohibited. Any private individual possessing one must report it immediately to the Communications Bureau, a police station, or the military police, or face punishment.

Those who are using a receiver after partially disabling its shortwave or longwave section are also requested to consult the Communications Bureau or the Broadcasting Corporation regarding the extent of the modification and to take the prescribed measures.

Domestic radio receivers, foreign-made receivers other than models certified by the Broadcasting Corporation, and specially constructed receivers, such as homemade sets, are prohibited if their reception range extends below 550 kHz or above 1,500 kHz.

Anyone possessing such a set must report it, submit it for inspection, and obtain instructions concerning the appropriate measures to be taken. If the set is subsequently discovered, its owner will be severely punished regardless of whether the owner possesses a broadcast-listening permit. The Communications Bureau urges everyone to comply so that no mistakes happen.

[Transcription]

京城日報 1944年11月25日

蔓を持たぬ犯人
技術には技術で
短波密聴に鋭い斎賀警部の勘

敵の謀略にうつつを脱かし物識顔でデマ放送をまことしやかに巷間に流布する短波密聴の売国奴どもを僅か六ヶ月の短期間に関係者〇〇名と五十台の機械を取り押さえ、謀略を未然に防いだ抜群の功で朝鮮最初の警察功績賞を受けた京畿道警察部高等警察課警部斎賀七郎氏に短波密聴の全貌を聴いた。

『ある流言事件の査察をしているうち鮮内で普通には知り得られない流言に辿りつき、これは確かに短波が使用されているという睨みから業者の関係、技術者の関係と各方面から査察の手をのばした。取調を開始したのは忘れもしない昭和十八年二月八日の大詔奉戴日であった』

『どんな大きな事件でも片付いたあとからの話は至極簡単だが検挙は並大抵のものではない。電波を放射する発信なら探知機で突止めることも出来るが、受信となると施設或は外見といった点から綜合して怪しいと狙ったのを検挙してゆくのだから実際にはなかなか困難な問題であった。警戒の手が伸びると巧妙になって外見は放送協会の認定品でありながら実際は内部を巧みに改造して素知らぬ顔をしているといった不逞さであった。現物の押収は二月だけで四月、五月と取調べが峻厳になるにつれ受信機を土の中に隠したり部分品を三つにも四つにも分け、内査では確証を握っておりながら家宅捜査を三回繰返して漸く部分品の一つをさがし出すといった調子で技術的には相当なものだった』

何の変哲もない小さな部分品にまで査察の眼を離さず執拗に喰下る斎賀警部の短波に対する腕の冴えは三十年前の兵営生活に育まれているのだ。通信兵として技術の修練を積んだ斎賀上等兵はシベリア出兵で作戦通信に挺身した腕に覚えの自信がいま大東亜戦争に大きく役立ったのも不思議な因縁だ。

普通のラジオでさえ調節が悪ければ聴きづらいのに、まして短波になると曲りなりにも技術を知らなければ密聴は出来ない。密聴するまでにはラジオの一つや二つは壊したことであろうから機械的には無線の技術をもったものとか学校で習ったもの或はラジオ商といった範囲の所謂インテリ層なのだ。また一方警察的には流言を辿るのだが途中で根が切れてなかなか辿れない場合が多い。よく芋蔓式というが、この場合はそう簡単にはゆかない。然し技術的協力ということはある。つまり自分のは最近聞えないが、どうした調子だろう。一寸検べてくれといった仲間同志の技術の協力だ。迷惑のかかった二百四十六名のうちから〇〇名が有罪となったのだが、なかには肉親が米本土にいるのでその安否を気づかって聴いていたという気の毒な人もあったが、不法施設はあくまで不法施設であって法の裁きは受けねばならないのだ。また或人はとんでもないデマを吹込まれながら鉄壁の決意をもって不逞のデマを自ら打ち砕いていた奇特な人もあった。

犯罪には女がつきものであるにかかわらず、短波の密聴に女が関連していないのも技術といった点から姿が見えなかったのかも知れない。

量的には壊滅したであろうが本質的に悪い奴は今なお密聴しているだろうという斎賀警部の胸中には第二、第三の検挙の秘策が練られているのかもしれない。誰もが手につけるような仕事は他人まかせだ、俺は人が手をつけないことをするという斎賀警部の手に挙がる次の戦果は果して何であろう。

京城日報 1943年6月29日

受信機の販売統制

重要物資の需給制限強化によりラジオの受信機や部分品の入手も相当困難となって来たので逓信局では配給販売を統制することになったが、右に関し逓信局深川監理課長は次の通り談話を発表した。

ラジオの受信機や部分品用材の割当は最近相当窮屈になって来たので今迄のように高級受信機を部屋の飾物にしたり不必要に二個以上据付けるというような向きには配給出来なくなった。今後はこれを統制して次の如く一戸一機主義により簡易低廉な受信機を広く普及する方針にした。即ち、

一、受信機所持者が増設する為に購入せんとするもの又は更に高級受信機を購入せんとするものには応じない。

二、放送局所在地や近距離の所など容易に聴取出来る地では簡易低廉な受信機を販売し高級受信機の販売を禁止する。なお此際特に御願いしたいことは貴重な国家の資源を遊ばすことなく有効に聴いて戴きたい。若し不用ならば必要な向きに譲って貰い二個以上あって不用なものは他に譲って活用して戴きたい。又現在聴取している受信機は大切に取扱って戴きたい。

京城日報 1943年6月26日

増えるラジオ聴取者
無許可者は早速手続を

その日その日が決戦である大東亜戦下のラジオは従来の娯楽本位から脱皮し国民生活と切離すことの出来ない銃後を守る大切な武器となり、聴取者はぐんぐん増加の一途を辿り、五日中の新規申込者は六千三百七十二名であったが、一方受信機の売却、故障、内外地転出で廃止が四千九百七十六名もあり、結局千三百九十六名の純増で総数二十七万八百五十四名となった。

この中には未だに許可を受けずに聴いているもの又は聴取廃止をし、そのまま聴いている者が相当あるので逓信局では放送協会と連絡して之等不法施設の一斉検挙を近く行うが、ラジオの不法施設は電信法により厳重処罰されることになっているから未だ許可を受けていないものはこの際至急手続きをとるよう逓信局では要望している。

京城日報 1943年3月12日

短波受信機はご法度
所持する者は今直ぐ届出よ

世界の空には何物にもさえぎることの出来ない電波の攻防戦が展開されている。電波は『見えない弾丸』として時間と距離を超越し敵国の心臓を衝く。敗戦に喘ぐ敵側は武力の不利をラジオ放送による謀略と宣伝戦で補わんと我が銃後攪乱のため今後ますます熾烈なデマ宣伝を企図するものと考えられるので、逓信局では昨夏敵国のデマ放送を傍取し得る機械即ち短波受信機の使用を禁止したが、鮮内のラジオ聴取者には趣旨の不徹底のためか届出を怠り、使用許可を得ずしてひそかに聴取しているもので摘発されたものも十数名にのぼっているが、逓信局では手元に短波受信機を持っているものは摘発をうけ処罰されないうちに自発的に申出るよう要望している。

京城日報 1942年9月9日

短波は絶対禁止
無届聴取は厳重処罰

短波受信機または全波受信機をお持ちの方はありませんか。時局下防諜上の見地から絶対禁止せられているから若し一般の方で、これ等の受信機を持っている方は至急逓信局なり警察署、憲兵隊に申出ないと処罰されます。短波または長波部分を一部切断して聴取している方も改装の程度を逓信局か放送協会に問合わせの上処置せられるよう逓信局では要望している。

国産のラジオ受信機或は放送協会認定品以外の外国製の受信機または自分で組立てたような特殊の受信機で五百五十キロサークルから千五百キロサークルを超えるものは禁止品となっているから届出をなし検査を受け適当な処置を仰いでいないと後日発見されたとき放送聴取許可証の有無に拘わらず厳重処罰されるから間違いの起こらないよう逓信局では要望している。

Sources:

• Digital Newspaper Archive, National Library of Korea
• Internet Archive (Keijo Nippo; June 29, 1943; page 3) (link)

See also:

• Saiga Shichirō (斎賀七郎), an Imperial Japanese Ideological Police officer responsible for the torture, false imprisonment, and deaths of countless Korean patriots, was assassinated in Seoul on Nov. 2, 1945 (reported by newly liberated Keijo Nippo) (link)
• Voice of America Korean Broadcast - first sent by shortwave from Washington, D.C. on June 13, 1942, with more regular Korean programming beginning from San Francisco on August 29, 1942 (Encyclopedia of Korean Culture link)
• Secret Shortwave Listening Incident - an incident in 1942 which Korean broadcasting-station employees secretly listened to shortwave broadcasts from Voice of America and the Korean Provisional Government in Chongqing, then passed along war news - around 300 broadcasting personnel and civilians were arrested and 75 were convicted (Encyclopedia of Korean Culture - link)